dev-libs/openssl: Updated dev-libs/openssl to v3.0.9
BUG=b/286042548
TEST=presubmit
RELEASE_NOTE=Updated dev-libs/openssl to v3.0.9. This resolves CVE-2023-2650.
Change-Id: Ia3d06289bfd92de42f6866e466cc6e96f66474dc
Reviewed-on: https://cos-review.googlesource.com/c/third_party/overlays/chromiumos-overlay/+/50421
Tested-by: Cusky Presubmit Bot <presubmit@cos-infra-prod.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Reviewed-by: Vaibhav Rustagi <vaibhavrustagi@google.com>
diff --git a/dev-libs/openssl/Manifest b/dev-libs/openssl/Manifest
index 5b940c8..63d18f7 100644
--- a/dev-libs/openssl/Manifest
+++ b/dev-libs/openssl/Manifest
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
DIST openssl-1.1.1t.tar.gz 9881866 BLAKE2B 66d76ea0c05a4afc3104e22602cffc2373e857728625d31ab3244881cafa91c099a817a09def7746bce4133585bfc90b769f43527e77a81ed13e60a8c2fb4d8d SHA512 628676c9c3bc1cf46083d64f61943079f97f0eefd0264042e40a85dbbd988f271bfe01cd1135d22cc3f67a298f1d078041f8f2e97b0da0d93fe172da573da18c
DIST openssl-1.1.1t.tar.gz.asc 833 BLAKE2B fc5e7069268e987a20241dfc4f080529c6e95e217c198568b09c833e390e68b25a604a5d3ec29c6a64b9dee9d42199fd3647214e536ba2f7b8b4e57aa4cba680 SHA512 1232a94fce991d62f008ae6d3d9b6fe68cb6378fe07450feb17a58eb2417fb385ffcb7e6b74eb683134be9ff6ccf6efa183f37f4dd521614fd5aeaddf000b90b
-DIST openssl-3.0.8.tar.gz 15151328 BLAKE2B e163cc9b8b458f72405a2f1bde3811c8d0eb22e8b08ff5608ec64799975f1546dcdce31466b8a1d5ed29bc90d19aa6017d711987c81b71f4b20e279828cf753a SHA512 8ce10be000d7d4092c8efc5b96b1d2f7da04c1c3a624d3a7923899c6b1de06f369016be957e36e8ab6d4c9102eaeec5d1973295d547f7893a7f11f132ae42b0d
-DIST openssl-3.0.8.tar.gz.asc 833 BLAKE2B 1949801150e254e9be648f33014a4a16f803b42ca5a302c3942d377013e983e0ea0cca8aed594e3f9ecde26c6e31d222581e991af5fae6cd451d7ee83541f4bb SHA512 e1c04f1179aded228b39005fd9e9f6f75aedafb938b77ac58c97a00973eb412d93b92ad1c447332a5d96850b62b01093502928e6c190bdd0234a94c4e815d2a6
+DIST openssl-3.0.9.tar.gz 15181285 BLAKE2B cc1df41fa12ba4443e15e94f6ebdc5e103b9dab5eab2e1c8f74e6a74fa2c38207817921b65d7293cb241c190a910191c7163600bb75243adde0e2f9ec31cc885 SHA512 86c99146b37236419b110db77dd3ac3992e6bed78c258f0cc3434ca233460b4e17c0ac81d7058547fe9cb72a9fd80ee56d4b4916bb731dbe2bbcf1c3d46bf31a
+DIST openssl-3.0.9.tar.gz.asc 833 BLAKE2B 9943ac65f83f48465cae83b37a1d004f6be4622e53c3025166d42954abe9215f1a6c2af58d4aa2b45fa51182fee5019e740969f694655b6c592bb278c68aacef SHA512 9949de6b57d5aa21da1d4b68a29eb37e302403c983bd7d2d8769b320aac4268a9f9091c5fb182862a4f89a9099660939fe609df87c66991b75f7695faf357caf
diff --git a/dev-libs/openssl/files/openssl-3.0.8-mips-cflags.patch b/dev-libs/openssl/files/openssl-3.0.8-mips-cflags.patch
deleted file mode 100644
index 111681f..0000000
--- a/dev-libs/openssl/files/openssl-3.0.8-mips-cflags.patch
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,30 +0,0 @@
-https://bugs.gentoo.org/894140
-https://github.com/openssl/openssl/issues/20214
-
-From d500b51791cd56e73065e3a7f4487fc33f31c91c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
-From: Mike Gilbert <floppym@gentoo.org>
-Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2023 17:56:58 -0500
-Subject: [PATCH] Fix Configure test for -mips in CFLAGS
-
-We want to add -mips2 or -mips3 only if the user hasn't already
-specified a mips version in CFLAGS. The existing test was a
-double-negative.
-
-Fixes: https://github.com/openssl/openssl/issues/20214
----
- Configure | 2 +-
- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
-
-diff --git a/Configure b/Configure
-index b6bbec0a85c4..ec48614d6b99 100755
---- a/Configure
-+++ b/Configure
-@@ -1475,7 +1475,7 @@ if ($target =~ /^mingw/ && `$config{CC} --target-help 2>&1` =~ m/-mno-cygwin/m)
- }
-
- if ($target =~ /linux.*-mips/ && !$disabled{asm}
-- && !grep { $_ !~ /-m(ips|arch=)/ } (@{$config{CFLAGS}})) {
-+ && !grep { $_ =~ /-m(ips|arch=)/ } (@{$config{CFLAGS}})) {
- # minimally required architecture flags for assembly modules
- my $value;
- $value = '-mips2' if ($target =~ /mips32/);
diff --git a/dev-libs/openssl/files/openssl-CVE-2023-0464-fix.patch b/dev-libs/openssl/files/openssl-CVE-2023-0464-fix.patch
deleted file mode 100644
index f4fddd5..0000000
--- a/dev-libs/openssl/files/openssl-CVE-2023-0464-fix.patch
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,221 +0,0 @@
-From 959c59c7a0164117e7f8366466a32bb1f8d77ff1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
-From: Pauli <pauli@openssl.org>
-Date: Wed, 8 Mar 2023 15:28:20 +1100
-Subject: [PATCH] x509: excessive resource use verifying policy constraints
-
-A security vulnerability has been identified in all supported versions
-of OpenSSL related to the verification of X.509 certificate chains
-that include policy constraints. Attackers may be able to exploit this
-vulnerability by creating a malicious certificate chain that triggers
-exponential use of computational resources, leading to a denial-of-service
-(DoS) attack on affected systems.
-
-Fixes CVE-2023-0464
-
-Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
-Reviewed-by: Shane Lontis <shane.lontis@oracle.com>
-(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/20568)
----
- crypto/x509/pcy_local.h | 8 +++++++-
- crypto/x509/pcy_node.c | 12 +++++++++---
- crypto/x509/pcy_tree.c | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
- 3 files changed, 42 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
-
-diff --git a/crypto/x509/pcy_local.h b/crypto/x509/pcy_local.h
-index 18b53cc09e..cba107ca03 100644
---- a/crypto/x509/pcy_local.h
-+++ b/crypto/x509/pcy_local.h
-@@ -111,6 +111,11 @@ struct X509_POLICY_LEVEL_st {
- };
-
- struct X509_POLICY_TREE_st {
-+ /* The number of nodes in the tree */
-+ size_t node_count;
-+ /* The maximum number of nodes in the tree */
-+ size_t node_maximum;
-+
- /* This is the tree 'level' data */
- X509_POLICY_LEVEL *levels;
- int nlevel;
-@@ -157,7 +162,8 @@ X509_POLICY_NODE *ossl_policy_tree_find_sk(STACK_OF(X509_POLICY_NODE) *sk,
- X509_POLICY_NODE *ossl_policy_level_add_node(X509_POLICY_LEVEL *level,
- X509_POLICY_DATA *data,
- X509_POLICY_NODE *parent,
-- X509_POLICY_TREE *tree);
-+ X509_POLICY_TREE *tree,
-+ int extra_data);
- void ossl_policy_node_free(X509_POLICY_NODE *node);
- int ossl_policy_node_match(const X509_POLICY_LEVEL *lvl,
- const X509_POLICY_NODE *node, const ASN1_OBJECT *oid);
-diff --git a/crypto/x509/pcy_node.c b/crypto/x509/pcy_node.c
-index 9d9a7ea179..450f95a655 100644
---- a/crypto/x509/pcy_node.c
-+++ b/crypto/x509/pcy_node.c
-@@ -59,10 +59,15 @@ X509_POLICY_NODE *ossl_policy_level_find_node(const X509_POLICY_LEVEL *level,
- X509_POLICY_NODE *ossl_policy_level_add_node(X509_POLICY_LEVEL *level,
- X509_POLICY_DATA *data,
- X509_POLICY_NODE *parent,
-- X509_POLICY_TREE *tree)
-+ X509_POLICY_TREE *tree,
-+ int extra_data)
- {
- X509_POLICY_NODE *node;
-
-+ /* Verify that the tree isn't too large. This mitigates CVE-2023-0464 */
-+ if (tree->node_maximum > 0 && tree->node_count >= tree->node_maximum)
-+ return NULL;
-+
- node = OPENSSL_zalloc(sizeof(*node));
- if (node == NULL) {
- ERR_raise(ERR_LIB_X509V3, ERR_R_MALLOC_FAILURE);
-@@ -70,7 +75,7 @@ X509_POLICY_NODE *ossl_policy_level_add_node(X509_POLICY_LEVEL *level,
- }
- node->data = data;
- node->parent = parent;
-- if (level) {
-+ if (level != NULL) {
- if (OBJ_obj2nid(data->valid_policy) == NID_any_policy) {
- if (level->anyPolicy)
- goto node_error;
-@@ -90,7 +95,7 @@ X509_POLICY_NODE *ossl_policy_level_add_node(X509_POLICY_LEVEL *level,
- }
- }
-
-- if (tree) {
-+ if (extra_data) {
- if (tree->extra_data == NULL)
- tree->extra_data = sk_X509_POLICY_DATA_new_null();
- if (tree->extra_data == NULL){
-@@ -103,6 +108,7 @@ X509_POLICY_NODE *ossl_policy_level_add_node(X509_POLICY_LEVEL *level,
- }
- }
-
-+ tree->node_count++;
- if (parent)
- parent->nchild++;
-
-diff --git a/crypto/x509/pcy_tree.c b/crypto/x509/pcy_tree.c
-index fa45da5117..f953a05a41 100644
---- a/crypto/x509/pcy_tree.c
-+++ b/crypto/x509/pcy_tree.c
-@@ -14,6 +14,17 @@
-
- #include "pcy_local.h"
-
-+/*
-+ * If the maximum number of nodes in the policy tree isn't defined, set it to
-+ * a generous default of 1000 nodes.
-+ *
-+ * Defining this to be zero means unlimited policy tree growth which opens the
-+ * door on CVE-2023-0464.
-+ */
-+#ifndef OPENSSL_POLICY_TREE_NODES_MAX
-+# define OPENSSL_POLICY_TREE_NODES_MAX 1000
-+#endif
-+
- static void expected_print(BIO *channel,
- X509_POLICY_LEVEL *lev, X509_POLICY_NODE *node,
- int indent)
-@@ -163,6 +174,9 @@ static int tree_init(X509_POLICY_TREE **ptree, STACK_OF(X509) *certs,
- return X509_PCY_TREE_INTERNAL;
- }
-
-+ /* Limit the growth of the tree to mitigate CVE-2023-0464 */
-+ tree->node_maximum = OPENSSL_POLICY_TREE_NODES_MAX;
-+
- /*
- * http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5280#section-6.1.2, figure 3.
- *
-@@ -180,7 +194,7 @@ static int tree_init(X509_POLICY_TREE **ptree, STACK_OF(X509) *certs,
- if ((data = ossl_policy_data_new(NULL,
- OBJ_nid2obj(NID_any_policy), 0)) == NULL)
- goto bad_tree;
-- if (ossl_policy_level_add_node(level, data, NULL, tree) == NULL) {
-+ if (ossl_policy_level_add_node(level, data, NULL, tree, 1) == NULL) {
- ossl_policy_data_free(data);
- goto bad_tree;
- }
-@@ -239,7 +253,8 @@ static int tree_init(X509_POLICY_TREE **ptree, STACK_OF(X509) *certs,
- * Return value: 1 on success, 0 otherwise
- */
- static int tree_link_matching_nodes(X509_POLICY_LEVEL *curr,
-- X509_POLICY_DATA *data)
-+ X509_POLICY_DATA *data,
-+ X509_POLICY_TREE *tree)
- {
- X509_POLICY_LEVEL *last = curr - 1;
- int i, matched = 0;
-@@ -249,13 +264,13 @@ static int tree_link_matching_nodes(X509_POLICY_LEVEL *curr,
- X509_POLICY_NODE *node = sk_X509_POLICY_NODE_value(last->nodes, i);
-
- if (ossl_policy_node_match(last, node, data->valid_policy)) {
-- if (ossl_policy_level_add_node(curr, data, node, NULL) == NULL)
-+ if (ossl_policy_level_add_node(curr, data, node, tree, 0) == NULL)
- return 0;
- matched = 1;
- }
- }
- if (!matched && last->anyPolicy) {
-- if (ossl_policy_level_add_node(curr, data, last->anyPolicy, NULL) == NULL)
-+ if (ossl_policy_level_add_node(curr, data, last->anyPolicy, tree, 0) == NULL)
- return 0;
- }
- return 1;
-@@ -268,7 +283,8 @@ static int tree_link_matching_nodes(X509_POLICY_LEVEL *curr,
- * Return value: 1 on success, 0 otherwise.
- */
- static int tree_link_nodes(X509_POLICY_LEVEL *curr,
-- const X509_POLICY_CACHE *cache)
-+ const X509_POLICY_CACHE *cache,
-+ X509_POLICY_TREE *tree)
- {
- int i;
-
-@@ -276,7 +292,7 @@ static int tree_link_nodes(X509_POLICY_LEVEL *curr,
- X509_POLICY_DATA *data = sk_X509_POLICY_DATA_value(cache->data, i);
-
- /* Look for matching nodes in previous level */
-- if (!tree_link_matching_nodes(curr, data))
-+ if (!tree_link_matching_nodes(curr, data, tree))
- return 0;
- }
- return 1;
-@@ -307,7 +323,7 @@ static int tree_add_unmatched(X509_POLICY_LEVEL *curr,
- /* Curr may not have anyPolicy */
- data->qualifier_set = cache->anyPolicy->qualifier_set;
- data->flags |= POLICY_DATA_FLAG_SHARED_QUALIFIERS;
-- if (ossl_policy_level_add_node(curr, data, node, tree) == NULL) {
-+ if (ossl_policy_level_add_node(curr, data, node, tree, 1) == NULL) {
- ossl_policy_data_free(data);
- return 0;
- }
-@@ -370,7 +386,7 @@ static int tree_link_any(X509_POLICY_LEVEL *curr,
- /* Finally add link to anyPolicy */
- if (last->anyPolicy &&
- ossl_policy_level_add_node(curr, cache->anyPolicy,
-- last->anyPolicy, NULL) == NULL)
-+ last->anyPolicy, tree, 0) == NULL)
- return 0;
- return 1;
- }
-@@ -553,7 +569,7 @@ static int tree_calculate_user_set(X509_POLICY_TREE *tree,
- extra->flags = POLICY_DATA_FLAG_SHARED_QUALIFIERS
- | POLICY_DATA_FLAG_EXTRA_NODE;
- node = ossl_policy_level_add_node(NULL, extra, anyPolicy->parent,
-- tree);
-+ tree, 1);
- }
- if (!tree->user_policies) {
- tree->user_policies = sk_X509_POLICY_NODE_new_null();
-@@ -580,7 +596,7 @@ static int tree_evaluate(X509_POLICY_TREE *tree)
-
- for (i = 1; i < tree->nlevel; i++, curr++) {
- cache = ossl_policy_cache_set(curr->cert);
-- if (!tree_link_nodes(curr, cache))
-+ if (!tree_link_nodes(curr, cache, tree))
- return X509_PCY_TREE_INTERNAL;
-
- if (!(curr->flags & X509_V_FLAG_INHIBIT_ANY)
---
-2.40.0.348.gf938b09366-goog
-
diff --git a/dev-libs/openssl/files/openssl-CVE-2023-0465-fix.patch b/dev-libs/openssl/files/openssl-CVE-2023-0465-fix.patch
deleted file mode 100644
index bcc726a..0000000
--- a/dev-libs/openssl/files/openssl-CVE-2023-0465-fix.patch
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,51 +0,0 @@
-From 1dd43e0709fece299b15208f36cc7c76209ba0bb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
-From: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
-Date: Tue, 7 Mar 2023 16:52:55 +0000
-Subject: [PATCH] Ensure that EXFLAG_INVALID_POLICY is checked even in leaf
- certs
-
-Even though we check the leaf cert to confirm it is valid, we
-later ignored the invalid flag and did not notice that the leaf
-cert was bad.
-
-Fixes: CVE-2023-0465
-
-Reviewed-by: Hugo Landau <hlandau@openssl.org>
-Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
-(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/20587)
----
- crypto/x509/x509_vfy.c | 12 ++++++++++--
- 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
-
-diff --git a/crypto/x509/x509_vfy.c b/crypto/x509/x509_vfy.c
-index 9384f1da9b..a0282c3ef1 100644
---- a/crypto/x509/x509_vfy.c
-+++ b/crypto/x509/x509_vfy.c
-@@ -1654,15 +1654,23 @@ static int check_policy(X509_STORE_CTX *ctx)
- goto memerr;
- /* Invalid or inconsistent extensions */
- if (ret == X509_PCY_TREE_INVALID) {
-- int i;
-+ int i, cbcalled = 0;
-
- /* Locate certificates with bad extensions and notify callback. */
-- for (i = 1; i < sk_X509_num(ctx->chain); i++) {
-+ for (i = 0; i < sk_X509_num(ctx->chain); i++) {
- X509 *x = sk_X509_value(ctx->chain, i);
-
-+ if ((x->ex_flags & EXFLAG_INVALID_POLICY) != 0)
-+ cbcalled = 1;
- CB_FAIL_IF((x->ex_flags & EXFLAG_INVALID_POLICY) != 0,
- ctx, x, i, X509_V_ERR_INVALID_POLICY_EXTENSION);
- }
-+ if (!cbcalled) {
-+ /* Should not be able to get here */
-+ ERR_raise(ERR_LIB_X509, ERR_R_INTERNAL_ERROR);
-+ return 0;
-+ }
-+ /* The callback ignored the error so we return success */
- return 1;
- }
- if (ret == X509_PCY_TREE_FAILURE) {
---
-2.34.1
diff --git a/dev-libs/openssl/files/openssl-CVE-2023-0466-fix.patch b/dev-libs/openssl/files/openssl-CVE-2023-0466-fix.patch
deleted file mode 100644
index 9a59d28..0000000
--- a/dev-libs/openssl/files/openssl-CVE-2023-0466-fix.patch
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,41 +0,0 @@
-commit 0d16b7e99aafc0b4a6d729eec65a411a7e025f0a
-Author: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
-Date: Tue Mar 21 16:15:47 2023 +0100
-
- Fix documentation of X509_VERIFY_PARAM_add0_policy()
-
- The function was incorrectly documented as enabling policy checking.
-
- Fixes: CVE-2023-0466
-
- Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
- Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
- (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/20564)
-
-diff --git a/doc/man3/X509_VERIFY_PARAM_set_flags.pod b/doc/man3/X509_VERIFY_PARAM_set_flags.pod
-index f6f304bf7b..aa292f9336 100644
---- a/doc/man3/X509_VERIFY_PARAM_set_flags.pod
-+++ b/doc/man3/X509_VERIFY_PARAM_set_flags.pod
-@@ -92,8 +92,9 @@ B<trust>.
- X509_VERIFY_PARAM_set_time() sets the verification time in B<param> to
- B<t>. Normally the current time is used.
-
--X509_VERIFY_PARAM_add0_policy() enables policy checking (it is disabled
--by default) and adds B<policy> to the acceptable policy set.
-+X509_VERIFY_PARAM_add0_policy() adds B<policy> to the acceptable policy set.
-+Contrary to preexisting documentation of this function it does not enable
-+policy checking.
-
- X509_VERIFY_PARAM_set1_policies() enables policy checking (it is disabled
- by default) and sets the acceptable policy set to B<policies>. Any existing
-@@ -377,6 +378,10 @@ and has no effect.
-
- The X509_VERIFY_PARAM_get_hostflags() function was added in OpenSSL 1.1.0i.
-
-+The function X509_VERIFY_PARAM_add0_policy() was historically documented as
-+enabling policy checking however the implementation has never done this.
-+The documentation was changed to align with the implementation.
-+
- =head1 COPYRIGHT
-
- Copyright 2009-2020 The OpenSSL Project Authors. All Rights Reserved.
diff --git a/dev-libs/openssl/files/openssl-CVE-2023-1255-fix.patch b/dev-libs/openssl/files/openssl-CVE-2023-1255-fix.patch
deleted file mode 100644
index 022aa7d..0000000
--- a/dev-libs/openssl/files/openssl-CVE-2023-1255-fix.patch
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,45 +0,0 @@
-From 02ac9c9420275868472f33b01def01218742b8bb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
-From: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
-Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2023 16:51:20 +0200
-Subject: [PATCH] aesv8-armx.pl: Avoid buffer overrread in AES-XTS decryption
-
-Original author: Nevine Ebeid (Amazon)
-Fixes: CVE-2023-1255
-
-The buffer overread happens on decrypts of 4 mod 5 sizes.
-Unless the memory just after the buffer is unmapped this is harmless.
-
-Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
-Reviewed-by: Tom Cosgrove <tom.cosgrove@arm.com>
-(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/20759)
-
-(cherry picked from commit 72dfe46550ee1f1bbfacd49f071419365bc23304)
----
- crypto/aes/asm/aesv8-armx.pl | 4 +++-
- 3 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
-
-diff --git a/crypto/aes/asm/aesv8-armx.pl b/crypto/aes/asm/aesv8-armx.pl
-index 6a7bf05d1b..bd583e2c89 100755
---- a/crypto/aes/asm/aesv8-armx.pl
-+++ b/crypto/aes/asm/aesv8-armx.pl
-@@ -3353,7 +3353,7 @@ $code.=<<___ if ($flavour =~ /64/);
- .align 4
- .Lxts_dec_tail4x:
- add $inp,$inp,#16
-- vld1.32 {$dat0},[$inp],#16
-+ tst $tailcnt,#0xf
- veor $tmp1,$dat1,$tmp0
- vst1.8 {$tmp1},[$out],#16
- veor $tmp2,$dat2,$tmp2
-@@ -3362,6 +3362,8 @@ $code.=<<___ if ($flavour =~ /64/);
- veor $tmp4,$dat4,$tmp4
- vst1.8 {$tmp3-$tmp4},[$out],#32
-
-+ b.eq .Lxts_dec_abort
-+ vld1.32 {$dat0},[$inp],#16
- b .Lxts_done
- .align 4
- .Lxts_outer_dec_tail:
---
-2.34.1
-
diff --git a/dev-libs/openssl/openssl-3.0.8-r1.ebuild b/dev-libs/openssl/openssl-3.0.8-r1.ebuild
deleted file mode 120000
index ce2d971..0000000
--- a/dev-libs/openssl/openssl-3.0.8-r1.ebuild
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1 +0,0 @@
-openssl-3.0.8.ebuild
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/dev-libs/openssl/openssl-3.0.8.ebuild b/dev-libs/openssl/openssl-3.0.9.ebuild
similarity index 96%
rename from dev-libs/openssl/openssl-3.0.8.ebuild
rename to dev-libs/openssl/openssl-3.0.9.ebuild
index 1a37bc0..664971f 100644
--- a/dev-libs/openssl/openssl-3.0.8.ebuild
+++ b/dev-libs/openssl/openssl-3.0.9.ebuild
@@ -50,15 +50,6 @@
/usr/include/openssl/configuration.h
)
-PATCHES=(
- "${FILESDIR}"/openssl-3.0.8-mips-cflags.patch
- # The following patches can be removed after updating to 3.0.9
- "${FILESDIR}"/openssl-CVE-2023-0464-fix.patch
- "${FILESDIR}"/openssl-CVE-2023-0465-fix.patch
- "${FILESDIR}"/openssl-CVE-2023-0466-fix.patch
- "${FILESDIR}"/openssl-CVE-2023-1255-fix.patch
-)
-
pkg_setup() {
if use ktls ; then
if kernel_is -lt 4 18 ; then
