|  | # Cumulative Kconfig recursive issue | 
|  | # ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ | 
|  | # | 
|  | # Test with: | 
|  | # | 
|  | # make KBUILD_KCONFIG=Documentation/kbuild/Kconfig.recursion-issue-02 allnoconfig | 
|  | # | 
|  | # The recursive limitations with Kconfig has some non intuitive implications on | 
|  | # kconfig semantics which are documented here. One known practical implication | 
|  | # of the recursive limitation is that drivers cannot negate features from other | 
|  | # drivers if they share a common core requirement and use disjoint semantics to | 
|  | # annotate those requirements, ie, some drivers use "depends on" while others | 
|  | # use "select". For instance it means if a driver A and driver B share the same | 
|  | # core requirement, and one uses "select" while the other uses "depends on" to | 
|  | # annotate this, all features that driver A selects cannot now be negated by | 
|  | # driver B. | 
|  | # | 
|  | # A perhaps not so obvious implication of this is that, if semantics on these | 
|  | # core requirements are not carefully synced, as drivers evolve features | 
|  | # they select or depend on end up becoming shared requirements which cannot be | 
|  | # negated by other drivers. | 
|  | # | 
|  | # The example provided in Documentation/kbuild/Kconfig.recursion-issue-02 | 
|  | # describes a simple driver core layout of example features a kernel might | 
|  | # have. Let's assume we have some CORE functionality, then the kernel has a | 
|  | # series of bells and whistles it desires to implement, its not so advanced so | 
|  | # it only supports bells at this time: CORE_BELL_A and CORE_BELL_B. If | 
|  | # CORE_BELL_A has some advanced feature CORE_BELL_A_ADVANCED which selects | 
|  | # CORE_BELL_A then CORE_BELL_A ends up becoming a common BELL feature which | 
|  | # other bells in the system cannot negate. The reason for this issue is | 
|  | # due to the disjoint use of semantics on expressing each bell's relationship | 
|  | # with CORE, one uses "depends on" while the other uses "select". Another | 
|  | # more important reason is that kconfig does not check for dependencies listed | 
|  | # under 'select' for a symbol, when such symbols are selected kconfig them | 
|  | # as mandatory required symbols. For more details on the heavy handed nature | 
|  | # of select refer to Documentation/kbuild/Kconfig.select-break | 
|  | # | 
|  | # To fix this the "depends on CORE" must be changed to "select CORE", or the | 
|  | # "select CORE" must be changed to "depends on CORE". | 
|  | # | 
|  | # For an example real world scenario issue refer to the attempt to remove | 
|  | # "select FW_LOADER" [0], in the end the simple alternative solution to this | 
|  | # problem consisted on matching semantics with newly introduced features. | 
|  | # | 
|  | # [0] https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1432241149-8762-1-git-send-email-mcgrof@do-not-panic.com | 
|  |  | 
|  | mainmenu "Simple example to demo cumulative kconfig recursive dependency implication" | 
|  |  | 
|  | config CORE | 
|  | tristate | 
|  |  | 
|  | config CORE_BELL_A | 
|  | tristate | 
|  | depends on CORE | 
|  |  | 
|  | config CORE_BELL_A_ADVANCED | 
|  | tristate | 
|  | select CORE_BELL_A | 
|  |  | 
|  | config CORE_BELL_B | 
|  | tristate | 
|  | depends on !CORE_BELL_A | 
|  | select CORE |