| .. _securitybugs: | |
| Security bugs | |
| ============= | |
| Linux kernel developers take security very seriously. As such, we'd | |
| like to know when a security bug is found so that it can be fixed and | |
| disclosed as quickly as possible. Please report security bugs to the | |
| Linux kernel security team. | |
| Contact | |
| ------- | |
| The Linux kernel security team can be contacted by email at | |
| <security@kernel.org>. This is a private list of security officers | |
| who will help verify the bug report and develop and release a fix. | |
| If you already have a fix, please include it with your report, as | |
| that can speed up the process considerably. It is possible that the | |
| security team will bring in extra help from area maintainers to | |
| understand and fix the security vulnerability. | |
| As it is with any bug, the more information provided the easier it | |
| will be to diagnose and fix. Please review the procedure outlined in | |
| 'Documentation/admin-guide/reporting-issues.rst' if you are unclear about what | |
| information is helpful. Any exploit code is very helpful and will not | |
| be released without consent from the reporter unless it has already been | |
| made public. | |
| Please send plain text emails without attachments where possible. | |
| It is much harder to have a context-quoted discussion about a complex | |
| issue if all the details are hidden away in attachments. Think of it like a | |
| :doc:`regular patch submission <../process/submitting-patches>` | |
| (even if you don't have a patch yet): describe the problem and impact, list | |
| reproduction steps, and follow it with a proposed fix, all in plain text. | |
| Disclosure and embargoed information | |
| ------------------------------------ | |
| The security list is not a disclosure channel. For that, see Coordination | |
| below. | |
| Once a robust fix has been developed, the release process starts. Fixes | |
| for publicly known bugs are released immediately. | |
| Although our preference is to release fixes for publicly undisclosed bugs | |
| as soon as they become available, this may be postponed at the request of | |
| the reporter or an affected party for up to 7 calendar days from the start | |
| of the release process, with an exceptional extension to 14 calendar days | |
| if it is agreed that the criticality of the bug requires more time. The | |
| only valid reason for deferring the publication of a fix is to accommodate | |
| the logistics of QA and large scale rollouts which require release | |
| coordination. | |
| While embargoed information may be shared with trusted individuals in | |
| order to develop a fix, such information will not be published alongside | |
| the fix or on any other disclosure channel without the permission of the | |
| reporter. This includes but is not limited to the original bug report | |
| and followup discussions (if any), exploits, CVE information or the | |
| identity of the reporter. | |
| In other words our only interest is in getting bugs fixed. All other | |
| information submitted to the security list and any followup discussions | |
| of the report are treated confidentially even after the embargo has been | |
| lifted, in perpetuity. | |
| Coordination with other groups | |
| ------------------------------ | |
| The kernel security team strongly recommends that reporters of potential | |
| security issues NEVER contact the "linux-distros" mailing list until | |
| AFTER discussing it with the kernel security team. Do not Cc: both | |
| lists at once. You may contact the linux-distros mailing list after a | |
| fix has been agreed on and you fully understand the requirements that | |
| doing so will impose on you and the kernel community. | |
| The different lists have different goals and the linux-distros rules do | |
| not contribute to actually fixing any potential security problems. | |
| CVE assignment | |
| -------------- | |
| The security team does not assign CVEs, nor do we require them for | |
| reports or fixes, as this can needlessly complicate the process and may | |
| delay the bug handling. If a reporter wishes to have a CVE identifier | |
| assigned, they should find one by themselves, for example by contacting | |
| MITRE directly. However under no circumstances will a patch inclusion | |
| be delayed to wait for a CVE identifier to arrive. | |
| Non-disclosure agreements | |
| ------------------------- | |
| The Linux kernel security team is not a formal body and therefore unable | |
| to enter any non-disclosure agreements. |