| # Copyright Seblu 2015 |
| --- a/src/netlib.c 2015-08-04 20:30:43.449468815 +0200 |
| +++ b/src/netlib.c 2015-08-04 20:31:40.317792002 +0200 |
| @@ -3997,11 +3997,7 @@ |
| } |
| } |
| |
| -#ifdef WIN32 |
| -__forceinline void demo_interval_display(double actual_interval) |
| -#else |
| - inline void demo_interval_display(double actual_interval) |
| -#endif |
| +void demo_interval_display(double actual_interval) |
| { |
| static int count = 0; |
| struct timeval now; |
| @@ -4060,15 +4056,7 @@ |
| important compilers have supported such a construct so it should |
| not be a big deal. raj 2012-01-23 */ |
| |
| -#ifdef WIN32 |
| -/* It would seem that the Microsoft compiler will not inline across |
| - source files. So there is little point in having an inline |
| - directive in that situation. Of course that makes me wonder if an |
| - inline directive has to appear in netlib.h... */ |
| void demo_interval_tick(uint32_t units) |
| -#else |
| - inline void demo_interval_tick(uint32_t units) |
| -#endif |
| { |
| double actual_interval = 0.0; |
| |
