| commit | 9f291f2348ed65eef879da461acc732e505b389f | [log] [tgz] |
|---|---|---|
| author | Matthieu Baerts <matthieu.baerts@tessares.net> | Wed Mar 15 21:25:17 2023 +0100 |
| committer | Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> | Thu Apr 06 12:10:58 2023 +0200 |
| tree | 8ba306cf3aff465aff4e33caf61506db6f93d3ac | |
| parent | d0386bd84e6d81990ef22e10657d5a5d9c209763 [diff] |
hsr: ratelimit only when errors are printed commit 1b0120e4db0bf2838d1ce741195ce4b7cc100b91 upstream. Recently, when automatically merging -net and net-next in MPTCP devel tree, our CI reported [1] a conflict in hsr, the same as the one reported by Stephen in netdev [2]. When looking at the conflict, I noticed it is in fact the v1 [3] that has been applied in -net and the v2 [4] in net-next. Maybe the v1 was applied by accident. As mentioned by Jakub Kicinski [5], the new condition makes more sense before the net_ratelimit(), not to update net_ratelimit's state which is unnecessary if we're not going to print either way. Here, this modification applies the v2 but in -net. Link: https://github.com/multipath-tcp/mptcp_net-next/actions/runs/4423171069 [1] Link: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20230315100914.53fc1760@canb.auug.org.au/ [2] Link: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20230307133229.127442-1-koverskeid@gmail.com/ [3] Link: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20230309092302.179586-1-koverskeid@gmail.com/ [4] Link: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20230308232001.2fb62013@kernel.org/ [5] Fixes: 28e8cabe80f3 ("net: hsr: Don't log netdev_err message on unknown prp dst node") Signed-off-by: Matthieu Baerts <matthieu.baerts@tessares.net> Reviewed-by: Steen Hegelund <Steen.Hegelund@microchip.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230315-net-20230315-hsr_framereg-ratelimit-v1-1-61d2ef176d11@tessares.net Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>