tree 2873a73c2b09103b11e6321ae78824a4f0a4f21d
parent 09aa5523eff17db400352192cf1f91dcf26d8b62
author Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org> 1444693521 -0700
committer chrome-bot <chrome-bot@chromium.org> 1447799982 -0800

UPSTREAM: arm64: Implement generic stage transitions for non-Tegra SoCs

The existing arm64 architecture code has been developed for the Tegra132
and Tegra210 SoCs, which only start their ARM64 cores in ramstage. It
interweaves the stage entry point with code that initializes a CPU (and
should not be run again if that CPU already ran a previous stage). It
also still contains some vestiges of SMP/secmon support (such as setting
up stacks in the BSS instead of using the stage-peristent one from
memlayout).

This patch splits those functions apart and makes the code layout
similar to how things work on ARM32. The default stage_entry() symbol is
a no-op wrapper that just calls main() for the current stage, for the
normal case where a stage ran on the same core as the last one. It can
be overridden by SoC code to support special cases like Tegra.

The CPU initialization code is split out into armv8/cpu.S (similar to
what arm_init_caches() does for ARM32) and called by the default
bootblock entry code. SoCs where a CPU starts up in a later stage can
call the same code from a stage_entry() override instead.

The Tegra132 and Tegra210 code is not touched by this patch to make it
easier to review and validate. A follow-up patch will bring those SoCs
in line with the model.

BRANCH=None
BUG=None
TEST=Booted Oak with a single mmu_init()/mmu_enable(). Built Ryu and
Smaug.

Change-Id: I28302a6ace47e8ab7a736e089f64922cef1a2f9f
Signed-off-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/12077
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
(cherry picked from commit 66a476ad5f29553ad7c46e58eb35faa7a059a5af)
jwerner: Conflicts with Kconfig and FSF address in removed files.
Signed-off-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/312853